Ryan Colby vs Christopher Li Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Recent second serve performances show Colby has a slight edge, winning 48.31% of points compared to Li’s 44.68%.
• When it comes to returning second serves, Li narrowly leads, capturing 41.38% of points versus Colby’s 40.79%.
• Who excels in returning first serves? Both players are almost equal, with Colby leading slightly at 34.17% over Li's 34.04%.
• Li has a slight upper hand in saving breakpoints, managing to save 57.14% compared to Colby’s 56.67%.
• Performance over the past year shows Li as the stronger player, winning 62.5% of their matches compared to Colby’s 50% win rate.
• Considering surface-specific skills, Li performs best on indoor hard courts with a 75% win rate, while Colby's strength lies on clay with a 53% win rate.
• On the tournament level, Li has been more successful in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, claiming 71.43% victories compared to Colby's 50% at the same level.
• Li typically faces weaker competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 341.94, while Colby competes against players averaging 255.17 in rank.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Colby holds an advantage, having won 100% of deciding sets, whereas Li has a 50% success rate.
• In break point conversion, Li leads significantly, converting 30.77% of opportunities, as opposed to Colby’s 17.65%.

Editorial Prediction (August 12, 2025, UTC):

When examining recent second serve performances, Colby shows a slight advantage over Li, which could play a pivotal role in the match. However, Li's stronger break point conversion rate indicates a potential edge during critical moments.

Li shows a superior overall match win rate over the past year, suggesting more consistent performance, while also excelling when playing at Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments compared to Colby.

Surface preference might influence the outcome; Li thrives on indoor hard courts, though the current surface is unspecified. Colby's advantage in deciding sets could trouble Li if the match extends.

Based on these assessments, the overall edge leans toward Li, considering their recent success across several key performance metrics.